Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
The Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient
Transcript of The Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient
It was developed by the University of Liverpool and the local Marie Curie Hospice during the late 1990s
The current version (V12) is a 24-page document which stays with the patient throughout their care
The LCP consists of: A multidisciplinary team is involved in deciding whether or not to put a patient on the pathway
All members of staff caring for the patient use the document as a guide to care
A full MDT review is undertaken every 3 days A patient is put on the pathway If all reversible causes of their condition have been considered
2 of the following apply: The patient is bedbound
The patient is only able to take sips of fluid
The patient is semi-comatose
The patient is no longer able to take tablets An audit from 2009 looked at 4000 patients in 155 hospitals
The vast majority of patients were comfortable in their last 24 hours
65% needed no subcutaneous medications to improve comfort
31% needed low dose medications; only 4% required high dose Less positive points:
Staff training was not consistent between centres
Not enough provision for spiritual/religious needs Letter to The Times (2009)
Artificially hastens death of some patients
"The inevitable outcome is death"
Accepts that checks and balances are built into the pathway
Concerns about the level of staff training Conclusions
The LCP is recommended by NICE and widely used
There are guidelines for entering a patient onto the pathway
A recent audit showed generally good outcomes, but highlighted some problems
Areas for improvement include staff training and better spiritual support