Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Apple v. Samsung (~2014-03-31)

No description
by

Jason Lee

on 2 May 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Apple v. Samsung (~2014-03-31)

Apple v. Samsung
Credits go to these sources
Major
http://www.scribd.com/doc/103615745/Apple-Closing?secret_password=1zgxzz1cswrp87zhukoz
http://ipinsiders.com/profiles/blogs/apple-vs-samsung-patent-war-explained-on-8-infographics?goback=.gde_77094_member_168394110
Others
http://prezi.com/6gdl8jbdigvb/copy-of-apple-v-samsung-intellectual-property-and-patent-infringement-case/
http://prezi.com/t8qqdklevef0/apple-vs-samsung/
http://prezi.com/wjlmpmfteeci/apple-vs-samsung/
http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Design_Patent/publish-60.htm
http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/MultiMedia_FileDownload.ashx?guid=0ec431d1-d9d2-4bd2-89cc-f1ee9c4d1022
http://quandarypeak.com/wp-content/uploads/Apple-v-Samsung-Timeline.jpg
http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/apple-vs-samsung-patent-war-timeline/#!DButR
http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/apple-vs-samsung-patent-war-timeline/#!DLmNL
http://readwrite.com/files/PatentWars_4fc7a08bd8d4b_w610.png
A TIMELINE OF THE BIGGEST FIGHT IN TECH
Aug. 2010: The warning
Apple warns Samsung it believes some Samsung phones and tablets infringe on Apple patents.

Oct. 2010: The failed meeting
Apple meets with Samsung to propose a licensing deal where Samsung would pay Apple up to $30 per phone an $40 per tablet. In comparison, six months earlier HTC agreed to pay Microsoft a reported $5 for every Android device sold. Samsung declines.

April 2011: The first lawsuit, and the countersuit

Aug. – Sept. 2011: Products pulled from shelves
Apple has sales of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 put on hold in Australia and secures an injunction on Galaxy Tab 10.1 sales in the EU

Nov. – Dec. 2011: 30 open lawsuits
More cases get filed. The fight now spans about 30 cases spanning North America, Asia, Europe, and Australia.

March – May 2012: Settlement talks begin (and fail)
July 2012: Apple publicly admits Samsung didn’t copy
A UK court orders Apple to post public notice that Samsung didn’t copy the iPad’s design — ostensibly because Samsung’s tablets just weren’t as cool.
August 2012: Apple’s $1 billion victory
After three days of deliberation the U.S. jury sides with Apple, awarding over $1 billion in damages and finding that 26 Samsung products infringed on both Apple software and design patents.

Apple quickly files a second U.S. lawsuit against Samsung, asserting 21 more devices released since August 2011

Oct. – Nov. 2012: Galaxy Nexus ban lifted
Dec. 2012: Apple’s patents called into question
The U.S. Patent of Trademark Office tentatively rejects all claims of Apple’s ’915 “pinch-to-zoom” patent

March 2013: Apple’s victory shrinks, retrial set
Judge Koh finds the U.S. jury calculated damages incorrectly, so she invalidates $450 million of the $1 billion awarded to Apple and orders a retrial to determine proper damages.

June 2013: ITC rules iPads infringe on Samsung patents
In a surprise win for Samsung, the U.S. International Trade Commission rules older iPhones and iPads should be barred in the United States for infringing on a standards-essential patent belonging to Samsung.

Aug. 2013: ITC ruling vetoed, ITC blocks older Samsung phones
The United States Trade Representative outright vetoes the June ITC ruling two days before going into effect.
A few days later, the ITC blocks some older Samsung phones from sale in the United States for violating two Apple patents.

Nov. 2013: Retrial starts, Apple seeks $379.8 million
Apple seeks $379.8 million; Samsung argues the amount should be $52 million. Judge Koh awards Apple $290 million in damages, bringing the Samsung’s total penalty in the first U.S. case down from $1.05 billion to $929 million.
March 2014: Samsung asked for $1 billion, immediately appeals
The $929 million judgement against Samsung in the first U.S. trial becomes official. The next day, Samsung files a formal appeal.

The second U.S. trial gets underway on March 31.
Apple seeks roughly $2 billion in damages. The second trial mostly concerns different patents and different products than the first trial. Unlike the first trial, Google may be a significant presence in the courtroom. Samsung claims four of the five patent claims against it are licensed from Google as part of Android.
SAMSUNG PAYS APPLE $1 BILLION SENDING 30 TRUCKS FULL OF 5 CENT COINS
Just a rumor &
unlikely to happen !
PART II
Full transcript