Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
UK Judiciary and Civil Liberties
Transcript of UK Judiciary and Civil Liberties
Know - The structure and role of the judiciary in UK.
Understand - The extent of judiciary's political role.
Skills - Knowledge, understanding and creative presentation.
Identifies the role of judiciary in a political sense.
Explains potential strengths and weaknesses of the judiciary's political role.
Useful Video Clips
TASK: Judiciary Structure Pyramid
What do the Judiciary do?
Create a pyramid for the UK Court Structure.
Outline each level's role, including:
*Role of Judges. *Connection to other levels.
1. How might judges prevent the abuse of power?
2. In what ways might judges be abusing their power?
Outlines the structure of the UK judiciary.
Was establishing the Supreme Court in 2009 a good idea?
Should politicians interfere in the sentencing of criminals?
What safeguards, limitations and principles impact on the Judiciary?
Are judges too powerful?
To what extent are UK judges both independent and neutral?
What is the difference between independence and neutrality?
Task: Independent and Neutral?
Evidence for Independence
Evidence against independence
Evidence for neutrality
Evidence against neutrality
Explains the difference between neutrality and independence.
Evaluates judges neutrality and independence.
TASK: 25 Mark Question
To what extent are UK judges both independent and neutral? (25 Marks)
Step 1: Make a judgement on the question.
Step 2: Make a case to support your judgment (3 explained points).
Step 3: Make a case against your argument (3 Explained points)
Step 4: Sum up your argument.
How far have civil liberties been eroded in the UK
TASK: Civil Liberties Pre 1997 Speed Read
Civil liberties should be allowed to be eroded in order to protect the greater good.
Explains the threats to civil liberties and the means by which they are protected.
Evaluates the extent to which civil liberties are protected in the UK.
How convincing are the arguments in favour of a British Bill of Rights?
Should the UK?
Retain the Human Rights Act (1998)
Create a British Bill of Rights.
Task: Human Rights Act
Using pp.286-287 outline:
1. Outline what it is.
2. How and why was the sovereignty of Parliament maintained?
3. Outline what the Belmarsh Case was and what its consequences were.
TASK: A British Bill of Rights?
The Conservative Party promised in its 2015 Manifesto to replace the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights.
1. Outline the progress made towards a British Bill of Rights.
2. Outline the arguments in favour of a British Bill of Rights.
3. Which is the most convincing and why?
Explains the Human Rights Act and the cases attached to it.
Assesses whether the UK should adopt a British Bill of Rights.
What has the European Convention on Human Rights ever done for us?
TASK: ECHR Research
Research the following cases and produce a factfile to help with examples:
Which of these judges have a political role?
What is the political role of the judiciary?
Court of Appeal Judges
Supreme Court Judges
Crown Court Judges
Magistrates Court, Tribunals and Family Proceedings Courts
Crown and County Court
Court of Appeal
Preside over court proceedings:
A Judge is rather like umpire in court - they make sure both sides follow the rules for a fair trial
They are a source of specialist knowledge - advising on points of law and procedure.
Interpret and Apply the law:
They interpret Parliamentary statutes
In theory - they should apply ‘the letter of the law’ but in practice they have a measure of discretion in their interpretation = can lead to conflicting interpretations
In some cases - to Make Law:
Laws ultimately mean what Judges say they mean - therefore in a sense all law is ‘judge made’ to an extent
However, some law is more Judge made than others e.g. Judges determine the nature of Common Law which is built up on the basis of Judicial Precedent
Decide on sentencing in criminal cases:
Judges have traditionally had a free hand in sentencing
However, this has been reduced in recent years as a result of wider use of minimum or mandatory sentences.
Chair public inquiries and commissions:
Judges have this role because they are seen as impartial and independent
Public Inquiries run like court proceedings
E.g. McPherson Inquiry into killing of Stephen Lawrence (1999); Hutton Inquiry into suicide of David Kelly (2003), the Leveson Inquiry into Press Regulation (2015)
To protect citizens from an overpowering state:
This is a very important role of the Judiciary. If citizens are unhappy with the actions of a govt or a public body (eg: NHS Trust) or feel that their Human Rights = violated - the courts can intervene
Eg: Anne-Marie Rogers - 2006 Court of Appeal decision in her favour (campaigned to be treated with cancer drug Herceptin)
HOWEVER - the courts cannot strike down legislation as unconstitutional because of the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty
They can call the govt. to account via Judicial Review - can decide that a dept/minister acted ‘ultra vires’ (beyond their powers)
This means that their role can be political at times.
Context: What do judges do?
TASK: Safeguards, Limitations and Principles
Safeguard and Limitation
Principle and Limitation
Principle and Safeguard
Categorise the cards into the correct areas.
Know - The safeguards, limitations and principles of the UK Judiciary.
Understand - Whether these restrictions support or damage democracy.
Skills - Debate, categorising evidence and analysis.
Categorises key safeguards, limitations and principles of the Judiciary.
Debates the influences on the judiciary.
Assesses whether there are too many restrictions on the judiciary.
Who should make decisions about how the law is implemented?
TASK: You're the Judge
Should the UK allow judges to overrule Parliament?
What would the benefits and drawbacks of this be?
'there is no liberty, if the judiciary power be not separated from the legislative and executive.'
Know - What judicial neutrality means and how it is maintained.
Understand - The arguments for and against judicial neutrality.
Skills - Categorising evidence, comparison and exam practice.
Categorises features of neutrality and independence.
The Investigatory Powers Act (2016)
- the Freedoms/Rights that belong to individuals - they protect the individual from the power of the state (generally described as negative rights - eg: right for state NOT to intervene unless the law prevents a certain activity)
Many overlap with Human Rights which belong to all individuals
Key Term: Civil Liberties
Read the handout Civil Liberties Pre-1997.
What do you notice about civil liberties in the UK at this time?
Was change needed?
What change would you have recommended?
Know - What civil liberties are, the threats against them and the protection afforded to them.
Understand -The extent to which civil liberties are protected by the UK judiciary.
Skills - Debate, skim reading and gathering evidence.
Debates the erosion of civil liberties for surveillance purposes.
TASK: Protecting Civil Liberties
Work in threes
Complete the research.
Prepare to report back.
Know - The place of the Human Rights Act in British law.
Understand - The debate surrounding a proposed British Bill of Rights.
Skills - Explanation, analysis, judgement and debate.
Outlines the debate surrounding a British Bill of Rights.
and how many can you name?
Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999)
C.N. V United Kingdom (2011)
Al-Jedda and Al-Skeini v United Kingdom (2011)
Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom
Abu Qatada v United Kingdom (2012)
Gough v United Kingdom (2015)
Armani da Silva v United Kingdom (2016)
TASK: What has the ECHR ever done for US?
Know - Key cases of the European Court of Human Rights
Understand - The significance of these cases for rights in the UK.
Skills - Research, summary and presentation
Researches key cases brought before the ECHR.
Explains the significance of cases involving the UK in the ECHR.
Evaluates the role of the European Court of Human Rights.
"Justice should not only be done, but must also be seen to be done."
What does this mean?
How far are judges in conflict with government?
Know -The different conflicts between government and judiciary.
Understand - The extent of conflict between the judiciary and government.
Skills - Discussion, judgement and analysis.
Judgement on extent of conflict
Effect on judicial independence
TASK: Conflict or Not?
Criticism of erosion of civil liberties
Lord Neuberger claiming that there is no more important role” than to protect fundamental human rights.(Nov 2016)
Involvement in key political debates
Judges the extent of conflict between the judiciary and government.
Discusses the meaning of a key principle of the judiciary.
Justice Minister Liz Truss slow to defend High Court judges after Brexit legal decision
What limits potential conflicts over power between the judiciary and government?
EXAM ALERT: To what extent is there conflict between the judiciary and the executive in the UK?
Look at the model response.
* Mark where you think there is Point, Evidence and Analysis.
* Discuss what is good about the response.
* Discuss what could be improved.
Evidence for conflict may be based on the following:
• Disputes over who controls sentencing policy.
• Disputes over the Human Rights Act when its exercise appears to
thwart the state’s ability to maintain state security (Abu Hamza,
• The increasing use of judicial review makes governing more difficult. Ministers are often accused of operating ‘ultra vires’ (e.g.extension of Heathrow).
• Over Freedom of Information cases where judges have upheld decisions of the Information Commissioner to publish information requested mainly by media against wishes of ministers (e.g. Prince Charles’ communications with ministers, some cabinet papers, decision reversed by Attorney general).
• The creation of the Supreme Court has made conflict more likely
and strengthens independence and autonomy
Evidence that there is no conflict can be based on the following:
• Judges are independent and cannot be subjected to political
pressure; each area is simply fulfilling its role. Ministers have
accepted the rulings of the judiciary.
• Judges uphold the rule of law so ministers must be subject to the law like any other citizen.
• Parliament is sovereign which means that with parliamentary
support, ministers can change the law to thwart judicial activism,thus ending a conflict.
• Judges cannot overturn statutes even if they offend the ECHR.
• It is rare for Judicial Review to go against the government
• Judges are not socially neutral, come from the same background as senior politicians and are likely to side with them
How have recent reforms affected the judiciary?
Know - Features of the Constitutional Reform Act (2005)
Understand - How far the Constitutional Reform Act created an independent judiciary.
Skills - Creative presentation and debate.
Up until 2005, The Lord Chancellor was a member of the legislature (House of Lords), the executive and the head of the Judiciary
Why do you think this proved untenable in the 21st Century?
AIM: How could this have undermined human rights?
TASK: Constitutional Reform Act Poster
Create a poster which represents the different features of the Constitutional Reform Act (2005)
Things to include:
*Background to reform
*Minister of Justice
*Judicial Appointments Committee
Identifies the reasons behind the Constitutional Reform Act (2005)
Assesses the changes brought about by the Constitutional Reform Act (2005)
Explains the features of the Constitutional Reform Act (2005)
How far is the UK judiciary now independent?
Not at all