Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Narrative techniques in couple therapy: from vicious circles to the unfold of virtuous projects
Transcript of Narrative techniques in couple therapy: from vicious circles to the unfold of virtuous projects
We understand identity as an
infinite process of construction
and reconstruction that takes place in different context of belonging. Often the couple is the most significant bound through which identity is constructed.
1930-1963: Marriage Counselling
1930-1966: Psychoanalytic experimentation
1963-1985: Family therapy
1986-2014: Refinement, Extension, diversification and Integration
Gurman. A (2008)
Phases and Challenges of CT
Why couples seek
Narrative Techniques in Couple Therapy
1. Definition of the relationship:
Disagreement in affective needs
2. Mechanisms of conflict resolution:
Combination of communication styles
Rhythms of reconciliation
Attempts of reparation
3. Organization of life in common:
Routines y rituals
Individual and couple spaces
4. Specific crisis:
Abuse and violence
1. Systems and developmental perspectives
Common characteristics of CT
2. Present focused
3. Balance favoring strengths (vs. weakness)
4. Brief therapy (8-10 sesions)
5. Focused on the system’s “problem maintenance structures”, patterns that revolve around presenting problems
6. Address intra and inter personal issues
7. The central healing relationship is the couple (not the therapeutic)
Incorporate the individual in CT
Application of CT to individual complains
Feminism, Multiculturality and constructivism
...as a project
Wanting to be the best for the other,
we bring out the best of ourselves
This is a basic
to use in CT
can "break" and lead to infinite forms of mistreatment, abuse of power and symptoms.
Rather than in specific objectives, the therapeutic focus lies on the projects and intentions with life.
For some couples, defining the project collaboratively can be a very important part of the therapy.
"Entering couples into an adventure"
Positions for witnessing:
Ask the person to imagine a
who will help to create and maintain a position of security/calm/curiosity, etc.
Ask the person to identify
in which he or she uses abilities, skills or perceptions that might be helpful for this context
Use the vantage point of a
version of self that is attending to "what is important
", rather than being right. begin by talking about hopes, values, and wishes for the relationship. Invite him or her to hold them.
Listen from the vantage point of "
to listen: videotape, closed-circuit video, one-way mirror, etc.
THANKS A LOT!!
The heuristic power of listening:
Never assume that you have understand something
Always check whether the meaning we give to the story is the intended meaning
The "hall of mirrors": our mere presence changes the narrative
"Choose roads" vs "find certainties"
Deconstructive questions in CT:
Therapists are responsible of asking in detail about the problem to make visible the underpinning social discourses and constrictive FCS
Session about family of origin: capturing and questioning those beliefs
Communication as a panacea and the narrowing of legitimate relationships
Common definitions of problems:
"Our relationship doesn't work"
"We are not compatible" or "he/she is a..."
"We have a lack of communication"
1. The problem: caution! is the dynamic not the relationship what should be externalized
2. The project: as a way of strengthening the counterplot
¿Cómo se refleja este
en vuestra relación?
¿ A qué
ha hecho este problema que lleguéis acerca de vuestra relación? ¿cómo o afectan estas conclusiones?
¿Cómo ha afectado este problema a vuestra
sobre la relación? ¿Cómo afecta esta percepción a vuestra interacción?
¿Qué tipo de
has formado sobre vuestra relación desde que ha estado bajo la influencia de este problema? ¿Cómo esto da forma a los patrones de vuestra relación?
¿De qué maneras pensáis que este problema ha influenciado vuestra
en el día a día? ¿hasta qué punto os lleva a adivinar lo que el otro es pensando?
observáis en el otro en respuesta al problema? ¿cómo afectan a vuestra relación?¿A qué técnicas, por culpa del problema, os sentís obligados a recurrir en vuestra vida de pareja?
How and when
Couples with a prolonged conflict and for stopping the "load the gun" phenomenon
Encourage each other to be storytellers and witnesses from a different new position
Ask the witness to what he or she has heard: openly or directed to exceptions. Then ask the teller about the witness
Use the hierarchy to determine the order
problem –vs– project
This is the most common circumstance we will have to deal with in CT: sessions that start with "as usual, everything is wrong" and end up with "we are on the right track"
Sometimes is the opposite: These are couples with a rigid plot of "is bad to have problems"
1. The narrative reparation multilayered and mulifaceted revolves around the couple's project
2. Searching entry points for developing the project
3. The turning point as the "narrative thread" between plots
From vicious circles to the unfold of virtuous projects
Recognize the multiplicity of ways in which is possible to be a couple
Te norms about intimacy and the use of power basically depend on sociocultural variables
(Freedman & Combs, 2008)
Story of the problem
Clarification of the complain and expectations
Story of each member
Special attention to Family of Origin
Story of the couple
Chapters of their story
Balance of each chapter
Define their project
Only the 50% of complains are genuine. Common traps:
Searching for allies (infidelity)
Searching a judge: who is crazy or guilty?
Unilateral and hidden decision of separation (benediction of the expert)
Homeostasis: everythins is the same but we are in therapy