Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Untitled Prezi

No description
by

Jurgis Kruglikovs

on 21 April 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Untitled Prezi

Research methodology
Conclusion
Data collection
Primary research data collection

March 27th 2013 until April 15th 2013

Online questionnaire from secondary sources

Convenience sample in combination with snowball sample

573 questionnaires
Facebook vs. Twitter and personality predictors of Social media usage
Summary
Limitations
Future research
Research Problem
Purpose
The purpose is to investigate what is the intention to use Facebook and/or Twitter.
Intention to use again
Satisfaction
Szymanski & Hise, 2000
Castaneda et. al., 2009
Sanchez-Franco & Roldan, 2004
Hausman & Siekpe, 2009
Content
Ease of use
Customization
Security
Sociability
Need for cognition
Cause of use
Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics
Factor analysis
Regression analysis
In all cases KMO ratios were >0.7 or close to 0.7
Six factors
satisfaction
content
security
sociability
need for cognition
cause of use
Multiple theoretical regression model




Results
Topic of project
The Internet and social networking services (SNS) in recent years have become essential part in our lives.

The number of users in social networking is growing.

So it is important to know why people prefer them
Theoretical background
Saw et. al. (2012) --> educational purposes
David and Li, (2011) --> Sociability and status
Keenan and Shiri, (2009) --> Social intentions
Research Model
Bansal et. al., 2004
Mithas et. al., 2007
Agarwal & Venkatesh, 2002
Srinivasan et. al., 2002
Mithas et. al., 2007
Tarafdar & Zhang, 2007
Srinivasan et. al., 2002
Gross & Acquisti, 2005
Hugos et. al., 2011
Qiu et. al., 2012
Hughes et. al., 2012
Butt & Phillips, 2008
Hughes et. al., 2012
Gender
70% female
Three universities
<200 respondents in Greece and Latvia
Why do we use Facebook and/or Twitter?
questionnaire (At, LV, GR)
statistical analysis
regression
factorial
The results
Austrians & Greeks use less Twitter
Latvians use Twitter more
References
Casteneda, J.A., Munoz, F. and Luque, T. (2009), “Web acceptance model: moderating effects of user experience”, Information & Management, 44 (1), 384-96.
Chen, G., (2011) “Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others”, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 755–762.
Chiang, O., (2011), “Twitter hits nearly 200M accounts, 110M tweets per day, focuses on global expansion”. Forbes. Available online at http://www.forbes.com/sites/oliverchiang/2011/01/19/twitter-hits-nearly-200m-users-110m-tweets-per-day-focuses-on-global-expansion/, accessed 26/2/2013
Churchill. G.A. (1999), Marketing research: methodological foundations (7th edition), Dryden Press.
Cooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S. (2006), Business Research Methods (9th Ed.), Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010), “Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use”, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247–253.
Costa, P. T., and McCrae, R. R., (1992) “NEO PI-R professional manual, Odessa, Florida”, Psychological Assessment Resources.
Daft, R. and Lengel, R., (1986), “Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design”, Management Science, 32(5), 554-71.
Demographics
573 respondents
Austria 264 (73 males, 191 females)
Greece 157 (60 males, 97 females)
Latvia 152 (48 males, 104 females)
Thank you for your attention and see you next year!
Full transcript