Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

IRL

No description
by

Ellen Ramsey

on 19 September 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of IRL

Illuminating the Repository: An open invitation
Already
Faculty Senate Open Access Resolution, 2010
All faculty encouraged to "reserve a nonexclusive, irrevocable, non-commercial, global license to exercise any and all rights under copyright relating to each of her or his scholarly articles in any medium, and to authorize others to do the same."
Now
Soon
Institutional and Authors' Repository
Authors and their peers can...
retain access
contribute to scholarship
share freely and with stability
fulfill funding requirements
collect new measures for P&T
The institution can...
show results of research across the institution
preserve access
wisely shepherd collections
support new measures for P&T
Why the OA resolution?
universities and libraries are buying back what researchers have already produced at our institutions
losing access to born digital works is a real danger an example: http://www.bio-diglib.com/ or http://libra.virginia.edu/catalog/libra-oa:3064
References
Bell, S., & Sarr, N. (2010). Case Study: Re-Engineering an
Institutional Repository to Engage Users. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(S1), 77–89. doi:10.1080/13614533.2010.509517
Casey, A. (2012). Does Tenure Matter? Factors Influencing
Faculty Contributions to Institutional Repositories. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1032
Frank, M. (2013). Open but not free--publishing in the 21st
century. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368(9), 787–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1211259
Holdren, J. P. (2013). Increasing Public Access to the
Results of Scientific Research. Washington, DC: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf

2
Electronic Theses and Dissertation Submissions
Moving away from print-only deposit to the library
Engineering already has Libra requirement for theses and dissertations
A&S moving from ProQuest to Libra after AY 2013
Libra for Electronic Theses and Dissertations
No cost to students or departments
Reduce time to access
Open access
Strict formatting requirements relaxed
ProQuest submission and print are still options
Already in the works
Submit your bigger data, fill public access data requirements
More UVA departments submitting ETDs via Libra
More discoverability
Convergence of new public access requirements and options
A sparkle in our eye
Mining repository for dynamic CVs and online portfolios (Bell & Sarr, 2010)
Author disambiguation through ORCID, etc.
Altmetrics of downloads
Capture even more diverse digital scholarship products for a changing P&T world
Opening access to the university and broader community
Stability and searchability of born digital content
Rights retained by author or holder granting permission
Capture diverse digital scholarship products
APTrust, SHARE, FASTR, White House directive
References
Howard, J. (2013, June 7). Universities and Libraries Envision
a “Federated System” for Public Access to Research. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/universities-and-libraries-envision-a-federated-system-for-public-access-to-research/44147
Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific Utopia: I.
Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1205/1205.1055.pdf
Nosek, B. a., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific Utopia:
II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. doi:10.1177/1745691612459058

References
Oberg, B. B., & Looney, J. J. (Eds.). (2008). The Papers of
Thomas Jefferson Digital Edition. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, Rotunda. Retrieved from http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/TSJN-03-06-02-0322
Palmer, C. L., Teffeau, L. C., & Newton, M. P. (2008).
Strategies for Institutional Repository Development: A Case Study of Three Evolving Initiatives. Library Trends, 57(2), 142–167. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0033
Revised Resolution on Open Access and Scholarship
Prepared by the Senate Task Force on Scholarly Publications and Authors’ Rights. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.virginia.edu/facultysenate/documents/OpenAccessResolution2-5-2010Revision.pdf
Suber, P. (2012). Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Retrieved from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/open-access

Why a repository at UVA?
Institutional repositories are designed by institutions to aggregate publications from their faculty and students (Casey, 2012)
UVA's Libra currently has over 1000 entries
''(OSTP) hereby directs each Federal agency with
over $100 million in annual conduct of research and development expenditures to develop a plan
to support increased public access to the results of research funded by the Federal Government'' by August 22 2013 (Holdren, 2013)
''He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening mine.'' - Thomas Jefferson to Isaac McPherson, 13 August 1813 (in Oberg & Looney, 2008)
Full transcript