Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


McDonalds v. H.R. Pufnstuf

No description

Cameron Weeks

on 19 May 2011

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of McDonalds v. H.R. Pufnstuf

Summary of Case McDonalds v.
H.R. Pufnstuf Created by Cameron Weeks and
Kelsey-Anne LeBlanc Issues of Case Outcome of the Case Opinion of the Case McDonaldland characters were found to have infringed on Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc.'s copyright of the show
The court stated that no ordinary person, let alone a child, would notice any contrast between Mayor McCheese's diplomatic sash and Pufnstuf's cummerbund
McDonald's was ultimately ordered to pay the Kroffts more than $1 million in damages when the case was finally settled in 1977
The magical place of McDonaldland was brought to an end
Many of the characters were phased out from the commercials
Ronald McDonald, Grimace, Hamburglar, and the French Fry Gobblins were the only characters to remain after the lawsuit http://itsjustnc.blogspot.com/2009/01/mcdonald-character-expos.html http://bigdigital.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_archive.html Before the Lawsuit After the Lawsuit McDonald's hoped the Kroffts would license its characters for commercial promotions, but they declined so McDonaldland was created anyway
It purposely was taken from the H.R. Pufnstuf show in an attempt to get the same appeal
The Kroffts sued McDonald's by arguing that the McDonaldland idea was completely taken from their television show
Later, a federal appeals court stated that previous Kroffts employees were hired to design and create the McDonaldland sets and costumes
Additionally, the same voice expert for H.R. Pufnstuf helped create McDonaldland character voices similar to the Kroffts'
The characters are played by puppets or costumed performers, very much like the H.R. Pufnstuf television program
More specifically, they claimed that Mayor McCheese from McDonaldland was a direct copy from their character H.R. Pufnstuf, who is also a mayor Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 562 F.2d 1157, decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1977 www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald's_legal_cases
www.coolcopyright.com/cases/chp5/kroftmcdonalds.htm www.shenmuedojo.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=859159 www.ratherchildish.tumblr.com/post/845621134/geekleetist-via-younggirlblues-mayor Sid and Marty Kroft, two brothers, created a popular children's television show, H.R.Pufnstuf
The Kroft brothers were contacted by Harper and Steers, Inc., an advertising firm that wanted to create an account with McDonalds
Harper and Steers, Inc. wanted to create McDonaldland and asked the Kroft brothers if they could use the Pufnstuf characters and adapt them for McDonaldland
Harper and Steers, Inc. told the Kroft brothers that they would receive money for the use of their characters but were later informed that the McDonaldland ad campaign had been cancelled
When McDonaldland commercials featuring the Pufnstuf characters started to appear, the Kroft brothers sued McDonalds Mayor
McCheese Pufnstuf In our opinion, the court made the correct decision. McDonald's did not compensate Sid and Kroft for their Pufnstuf characters. Although, the Kroft brothers gave McDonald's permission to use their characters, the brothers thought they would be getting some kind of monetary gain. When McDonald's failed to pay the Kroft brothers, I believe the brothers acted wisely by suing the McDonald's corporation
Full transcript