Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
The Craft of Research Ch. 9 and 10
Transcript of The Craft of Research Ch. 9 and 10
Assembling Reasons and Evidence To see if the order of your reasons makes consecutive sense, outline the logical structure of your argument using a "storyboard" (See top of page 131) The core of an argument=a claim and its support
The set of reasons must be plausible, clear, and in a logical order in your paper Reason vs. Evidence
"Stricter gun control legislation is needed (Claim) because too many people are killed by misuse of their own weapons. (Reason) Studies have shown that gun owners and their families three times more likely to be shot during a home invasion than are the perpetrators." (Evidence) As you formulate your paper, imagine readers asking:
*How do you know that?
*What facts make it true? Building an Argument:
Good Evidence: strong, solid, bedrock foundation
Bad Evidence: flimsy, weak, thin Evidence should be
*Record data completely and clearly
*Double check before, during, and after Precision
"In many cases, the sometimes weak application of the gun control law has caused a great number of unnecessary accidents." Sufficient Evidence
Be careful of not providing enough evidence to cover your claim. Representative
"According to Anderson, 50% of all handgun accidents in the state of Oklahoma are caused by guns being left within the reach of children." Authoritative
"According to Wikipedia, most gun accidents happen because of lack of training in firearms instruction." Chapter 10: Acknowledgments and Responses Acknowledging their imagined presence and bringing in the voices of others establishes a cooperative relationship with readers. Two kinds of questions readers may ask about your argument:
Extrinsic soundness Use the questions on pages 140 and 141 to consider whether your argument acknowledges alternate points of view In the process of assembling your argument, use these questions to test it as your readers will and then acknowledge and respond to the most important objections. Acknowledge questions that you can't answer, but respond that
1) the rest of your argument more than balances the flaw
2) more research is needed to find a way around it
3) your argument (though it cannot be accepted fully) offers important insights Responding to Arguments
Some claim that any strict gun control legislation limits Constitutional rights, but while this may be somewhat true, the lives that could be saved by tighter regulations make such limitations relatively insignificant. The Vocabulary of Acknowledgment/Response
Introduce it with "despite/regardless of/notwithstanding"
"Regardless of the fact that stricter gun legislation could infringe upon our Constitutional rights..." Use also:
Even though most home owners claim that their guns offer protection against intruders, evidence shows that they or their family members are much more likely to be shot than an intruder. Three Predictable Disagreements
1) There are causes in addition to the one you claim.
The increase of gun accidents could also be blamed on the overall prevalence of violence in our society. Counterexamples/Exceptions
Try to predict them in advance of your reader, then explain why you don't consider them as damaging as your reader does. Readers may not accept your definitions
Define "gun control." What would "stricter" regulations involve?
What the reader really wants to know is....How would these harsher regulations infringe upon civil rights?