Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Transcript of Research Reports
How to conduct a critique Design (re)VISITED Discussion Believability? Theoretical Framework Introduction Interpreting Findings Research literature review generalizability Critique:[kri-teek] Writing Style building scholarship Analysis DESCRIPTIVE Correlational statistical tests significance sample numerical presentation TABLES Now it's your turn! POPULATION Group Activity Qualitative Research Methodology introduction Background Design Data Collection Theoretical Framework Analysis & Results Discussion Please get into groups of four and use the Research Report Evaluation Tool to review the Riegel et al. article. You will have 30 mins for this exercise and then we will reconvene to discuss results. Each group will need a spokesperson!! :-) P-values Research Process Specific Aims | Methodology Evaluating Research Reports an article or essay criticizing a literary or other work; detailed evaluation; review.
a critical comment on some problem or subject
the art or practice of criticism. ABSTRACT author Title Robustness recent
original sources conceptual models used to guide the study
Framework identifies various concepts
and the relationships BETWEEN those concepts
research study BUILDS on theory through
CLEARLY defined and explained Population & Samples
Instrument & Tools
Validity CHARTS & GRAPHS DESIGN Quantitative vs. Qualitative?
Cross Sectional Why critique?
Quan AND Qual ...
pulling it all together Dimensions Substantive Theoretical ETHICAL Methodological Interpretive Stylistic Lit Review clinical implications logical consistency significance Descriptive Statistics?
Statistical Tests for each hypotheses?
Tables used wisely?
Sufficiently objective? Statement of Problem current gaps Purpose of the Study This is what we don't know WE have a big problem This is why we need to do this... Significance - so what? (cc) photo by tudor on Flickr This is why it matters clearly stated?
Congruent w/data? (t=1.99, p<.001) (n=259) (Mean=30.5, SD 5.2) STATS 101 Thank You!! How about a break? Descriptive vividness
Analytical and interpretative preciseness
Philosophical or theoretical connectedness
Heuristic relevance The exercise of a critique was a useful task to apply the knowledge of research.
Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the study including the constraints and limitations, helps to review the research process.
The research critique gives room for the authenticity of the information and to analyze the credibility of the findings and to weigh the evidence base in terms of practicality, objectivity, utilization, application and replication possibility. CONCLUSION: Comprehension