Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Part 2--Dimensions of the Framework for K-12 Science Education
Transcript of Part 2--Dimensions of the Framework for K-12 Science Education
Ideas Crosscutting Concepts Vision NGSS Development Building on the past... preparing for the future Who is involved? How are these standards new? How can I get involved? Connections with Math and ELA Science, engineering and technology permeate modern life The workforce of the 21st century requires proficiency in science concepts and skills Understanding of science and engineering is critical to participation in public policy and good decision-making
Helen R. Quinn (Chair), Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA
Wyatt W. Anderson, Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Tanya Atwater, Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Philip Bell, College of Education, Learning Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Thomas B. Corcoran, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY
Rodolfo Dirzo, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Phillip A. Griffiths, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ
Dudley R. Herschbach, Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
Linda P.B. Katehi, University of California, Davis, CA
John C. Mather, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
Brett D. Moulding, Utah Partnership for Effective Science Teaching and Learning, Ogden, UT
Jonathan Osborne, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
James W. Pellegrino, School of Education & Social Policy, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
Brian Reiser, School of Education & Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Rebecca R. Richards-Kortum, Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX
Walter G. Secada, School of Education, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL
Deborah C. Smith, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards Committee Members Final Draft Released in 2011 Public draft in 2010 Science Children are born investigators Depth over breadth
--focus on core ideas and practices Connecting to students' interests is essential Promoting equity is essential for science and society Understanding builds over time 1. Asking questions and defining problems 1.Patterns What is a
"Disciplinary Core Idea?" Has broad importance across multiple science or engineering disciplines or is a key organizing concept of a single discipline Provides a key tool for understanding or investigating more complex ideas and solving problems Relates to the interests and life experiences of students or can be connected to societal or personal concerns that require scientific or technical knowledge Is teachable and learnable over multiple grades at increasing levels of depth and sophistication Physical Science PS4--Waves and their applications in technologies for information transfer Life Science PS1--Matter and its interactions PS2--Motion and stability:
Forces and interactions PS3--Energy LS1--From molecules to organisms:
Structures and processes LS2--Ecosystems: Interactions, energy, and dynamics LS3--Heredity: Inheritance and variation of traits LS4--Biological evolution:
Unity and diversity Earth and
Space Sciences ESS3--Earth and human activity ESS2--Earth’s systems ESS1--Earth’s place in the universe Engineering, Technology
and Applications of Science ETS1 Engineering design
ETS2 Links among engineering,
science and society --Coordination with Common Core State Standards Kansas Beyond Kansas Review the public draft When will these be done? $? assessment Kansas Review Team http://www.ksde.org/Portals/48/Documents/Building%20Capacity%20for%20Science%20Education%20in%20Kansas%20NGSS%20review%20group.pdf 2010 1/2010-7/2011 2012 Next Steps? --Standards as Performance Expectations --Integration of Science and Engineering Practice with Disciplinary Core Ideas --Science and Engineering Practices and Crosscutting Concepts are continuums --Particular practices and/or crosscutting concepts emphasized for clarity and assessment purposes --Science concepts build over K-12 --Greater focus on understanding and application of content as opposed to memorization of scientific facts --Integration of science and engineering and encourage others to do the same Read the Framework Here: www.nextgenscience.org Register and post regularly to www.ksde.org/science --Electronically dynamic 2013 2011 Adoption? Implementation? ...if not this one, then the next one Engaging in Argument from Evidence Identify flaws in their own arguments and modify and improve them in response to criticism. Construct a scientific argument showing how data support a claim. http://inquiryproject.terc.edu/prof_dev/pathway/pathway4.cfm?pathway_step=step7&pathway_substep=substep2&case=4_cc4&case_step=step4 Advancing Instruction to maximize student learning. http://www.ksde.org/science National Research Council-- committee to take on the task of building on past efforts to renew our vision for science education ...reinforcing the criticism that our schools’ science curricula tend to be.. ...these are goals for all of the nation’s students... Too often, standards are... throughout their lives. "Students should recognize that our current scientific understanding of the world is the result of hundreds of years of creative human endeavor." ...not just those who pursue higher education or careers in science, engineering, or technology. loooong lists of facts facts facts facts facts facts a m-i-l-e w-i-d-e Not only does this approach alienate young people and an inch deep. ...and little sense of the inherent logic and consistency of science ...it neglects the need for students to engage in doing science and engineering... kn o w l e d ge ...it leaves our students with By the end of the 12th grade, students should have sufficient knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public discussions on science-related issues, to be critical consumers of scientific information related to their everyday lives, and to be able to continue to learn about science Science and Engineering Practices 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information 7. Engaging in argument from evidence 6. Constructing explanations and designing solutions 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 3. Planning and carrying out investigations 2. Developing and using models 7. Stability and change 6. Structure and function 5. Energy and matter 4. Systems and system models 3. Scale, proportion, and quantity 2. Cause and effect Crosscutting Concepts http://learningcenter.nsta.org/products/symposia_seminars/Ngss/webseminar.aspx?utm_source=enewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=BookBeatNov2012