Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Warlords in Africa

No description
by

Zhan Kenchinbayev

on 10 December 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Warlords in Africa

Overview of the problem
Realism
Is the phenomenon of warlords a sign of the increasing irrelevance of ‘the state’ in international politics?

Neo Liberalism
Marxism
Social Constructivism
Post-colonialism
Thank you fro the attention!
Warlords in Africa
Kenchinbayev Zhan 20133205
The definitionof a warlord differ, but most authors agree that a Warlord is an actor who accumulate
power and wealth for private means by using military force in an environment where the
formal state has little or no control
Do warlords represent a new form of resistance to West’s attempts to impose neoimperialism
and in that case, to what cost? Or are warlords simply criminal individuals who
undermine already weak states’ capabilities?
Would a realist choose to study warlords?

“Despite their abuse of power and at times unattractive behaviour, local rulers also performed important social functions, supporting religion, culture and encouraging some aspects of a primitive form of civil society. The warlord by contrast was a negative phenomenon/…/his power rested on the possession of military forces, he occupied
territory in a strictly predatory manner and his social activities seldom enriched the lives of civilian families in his grasp/…/it implied protectionism, racketeering and the interception of revenues without any mitigating cultural or religious commitments”
[Mac Kinlay, 2000, p.49].
Full transcript