Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

CPP Levels of Work and Rated Job Complexity

We set out to answer the question: "Do CPP Levels of Work assignments match the HR/CCM rated Levels of Work for existing job incumbents?"
by

Paul Barrett

on 14 March 2017

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of CPP Levels of Work and Rated Job Complexity

Rated Job Complexity and Cognadev's CPP Levels of Work
Paul Barrett & Maretha Prinsloo
In a recent Cognadev Technical Report
*
, we investigated the relationship between Stratified Systems Theory (SST) Levels of Work for actual organizational job-roles, and the SST levels assessed from the job-incumbents' performance on Cognadev’s Cognitive Process Profile (CPP).
https://goo.gl/RpUIqP
*
Elliott Jaques' Levels of Work
Adapted from Figure 1 of: Jaques, E., Bygrave, C., & Lee, N. (2001).
Aligning multiple time horizons and multiple functions in strategic planning and budgeting.

International Journal of Organizational Analysis
, 9, 3, 257-271.
Stafford Beer's Viable Systems Model
System 1
:
contains several primary activities. Basic functionality.

System 2
:
represents the information channels and bodies that System 1 to function and System 3 to monitor.

System 3
:
represents the big picture view of the processes inside of System 1.

System 4
:
responsible for looking outwards to the environment to monitor how the organization needs to adapt to remain viable.

System 5
:
is responsible for policy decisions within the organization as a whole.
The CPP Integration of Jaques & Beer
The Study Aim
To investigate the relationship between CPP-identified current and potential levels of work and CCM & HR-rated levels of work using incumbent employees in specific job roles.
In the four samples analyzed as part of this study, employees from the mining, manufacturing and retail industries from 3 organizations were included.

A large number of roles were involved which primarily spanned Pure Operational to Parallel Processing work-complexity.

A fair proportion of the roles from the manufacturing and mining industries in particular represent managerial and executive functioning.

A total of
1157
cases comprised the aggregate sample, although each constituent sample was analysed separately because results did show some organizational specificity,
possibly as a result of the differing use of the formal CCM job analysis estimation vs subjective assignment of the job SST level
.
The Samples
We are attempting to show that the CPP is effective in providing important information about a test-taker's current and potential Level of Work.

That information can be very useful for personal and leadership development strategies within organizations.
Results:
Correlations

CPP
Current
Level of Work
In the aggregate data sample, the correlation between the CCM/HR and CPP Current Level of Work SST assignments is
.52
, with constituent sample values ranging between
.44
and
.98
.

CPP
Potential
Level of Work
For the CPP Potential level of work, the aggregate sample correlation was
.46
, with constituent sample values ranging between
.42
and
.71
.

The CPP report indicates a person’s
current
and
potential
work environment, where they may be most productive, comfortable and in flow with the job requirements.
*
As the Level of Work data are ordered-classes {1...5}, we used Goodman-Kruskal gamma correlations
*
Results:
Classification Accuracy

In the next two slides we show how well the CPP Current Levels of Work assignments
exactly
match the Current Levels of Work ratings by HR using personal judgements or the CCM.
First we show the range of the observed classification accuracies where exact-matches between Levels of Work are indexed.

Then we answer the question:
"if the CPP was only allocating Levels of Work at random
(i.e. it was a totally inaccurate assessment)

what classification accuracy would we then expect to observe?"
Results:

CPP Classification Accuracy

An example classification table using Sample 2 data (Table 10, p. 9, in Technical Report #8)
Gamma correlation is
0.90
;
Classification accuracy is
45%
.
Results:

Random CPP LOW Classifications

Here, we create data where we now randomly allocate the CPP current Levels of Work (LOW) across each CCM rated level, retaining the same proportion of cases we observed at each CCM level.

This simulates what the frequencies of CPP Levels of Work might look like if the test was so inaccurate that it was producing LOW 'scores' which were, for all intents and purposes, entirely random .
Classification accuracy is now just
26%
instead of
45%
Given the fact that many job-role levels were
subjectively
assigned by a single HR executive rather than using the more-formal CCM Levels of Work assignments, the results nevertheless indicate
a meaningful overlap
between SST job levels and the CPP Levels of Work assignments.
Introduction
1
2
3
4
5
Stratified Systems Models
Elliott Jaques SST:
uses “timeframe” as the key indicator of complexity within hierarchical organisational structures.
Stafford Beer's Viable Systems Model (VSM):
based on cybernetic principles. It refers to the organisational structure of autonomous systems capable of reproducing themselves to be viable in changing environments.
Maretha Prinsloo's CPP Level of Complexity:
Focuses on the complexity preferences and capabilities of people.
Complexity is measured in terms of:

a)
unit of information

b)
stylistic preference

c)
judgement capability, and

d)
job-related tendencies and preferences including specialist
vs
generalist focus; short
vs
long term feedback, tangible
vs
intangible information; structured
vs
unstructured contexts.
Complexity in the CPP
Cognadev's CCM
The CCM is an online job analysis questionnaire which is used to evaluate the SST level of a position, its cognitive and broader competency requirements and the degree to which a person or team matches certain work-related competency requirements.
https://goo.gl/Tg5rJd
C
ontexualised
C
ompetency
M
apping
CPP and SST Levels of Work
The complexity measured at
Level 4 CPP
is sufficient for effective functioning at levels 4 and 5 of the SST.

CPP level 5
complexity will enable effective cognitive functioning in SST levels 5, 6 and 7.

CPP complexity is applicable within a variety of organisational structures including: hierarchical, holarchic, flat, matrix and circle structures.
Full transcript