Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Waste Disposal

No description
by

Hannah Reddaway

on 18 February 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Waste Disposal

Phase one, during consultation:
Regular updates in Harpshire newspaper
Monthly meetings for stakeholders
Postal survey
Why this has to be done
Incineration

Advantages
Operational within a year
Electricity produced can be sold

Disadvantages
Around £30m capital cost
Still requires waste to landfill
Believed to emit carcinogenic and teratogenic toxins
Usually run on fixed-tonnage contracts
Case Study: Incinerator in Stoke
Vibration
Waste Disposal Facility in Raley Valley
Why this has to be done
Introduction
Options Considered
Why this has to be done
Mitigating Problems
Mitigating Issues
Why this has to be done
After Use
Why this has to be done
Overview
Poor agricultural
land
Land raising site
Nature Reserve
Preserving Nature
Local Residents and Businesses
Leachate Leakage
Methane
Odours
Vermin
Transplanting Shepherd's Sporran and Brazen Ragwort

Biodiversity offsetting

Plant trees around the site

Perimeter fencing
Grassland and wooded nature reserve

Use the technique of coppicing

Transplant Shepherd's Sporran and Brazen Ragwort

Involve local community
Case study
Our Proposal
Land Raising Site
Cheapest
Quickest (we only have 12 months)
Use the technique of baling
Reduces transportation costs - fewer lorries
Reduces dust and odours
Other options:
Dump - environmentally unfriendly
Landfill (excavation) - expensive and environmentally destructive
Three Options:
Incineration - £32/tonne
Recycling
Landfill (current, and new sites) - £24/tonne
Overview of problem
Construction
What concerns you?
Timings
Stakeholder Consultation Strategy

• Methane emissions




• Landfill strategies – Methane collection and electricity generation.


Existing landfill site closes in one year

Willingsborough, Harpshire, has a population of 250,000 requiring domestic waste removal

100,000 tonnes of waste per annum estimated
Always an issue with landfill sites

This will be mitigated by:
- Fence perimeter
- Standard vermin control practices
Measures taken to accommodate all stakeholders

We have proposed solutions, but we are open to suggestions

Work will only occur between 9am and 5pm

Maximum noise that can be heard (75 decibels, same as a small vacuum cleaner)

Deliveries restricted to non-busy periods
Phase two, during construction:
Continue monthly meetings and newspaper updates
Phase three, during operation:
Biannual meetings
Phase four, during decommission:
Workshops for locals to have input in the nature reserve
Contact details
Site 20 miles from Willingsborough
Combination of landfill and recycling
Methane collection methods and generation of electricity on site
Leachate control and treatment
After use nature reserve
E-mail

info@wastesolutions.co.uk

Facebook

www.facebook.com/raleyvalley

Twitter

@wastesolutions

Telephone
0114-555-4122
Time
Cost
Environment
Decision Triangle
Recycling

Advantages
Good for the environment and natural resources
Reduces waste to landfill
Reduces emission of greenhouse gases

Disadvantages
Potentially costly
Scheme estimated to take 3/4 years to implement
Landfill

Current landfill site (40 miles away)
Passes through Farrington

Newly proposed landfill site (20 miles away)
In an area of natural outstanding beauty
Considered best choice from 23 sites
Planning authority 'sympathetic' to the situation

Landfill

Advantages
Can handle large volumes of waste
Can be covered after use

Disadvantages
Odours and smells, can be mitigated
Transportation costs involved
Decision

Combination of landfill and recycling

New site to be used (20 miles away)
Recycling scheme to be introduced at a later date
Landfill lifetime increased

Common Causes: Under-designed, poorly installed and maintained









Measures Taken:


Double Liners and Capping

Leachate Collection
& Monitoring System




Left: River Arun. Right: Connonbridge landfill site leakage


• Landfill Odour




• Landfill Odour control

Noise
Road Safety
There will be no damage
caused by vibration
2mm/s is much less
than 15mm/s which
causes cosmetic
damage


Some barriers will be set up
Plant more trees along the road


A speed limit will be imposed on lorries passing through the village
Road side railings will be installed for pedestrian safety


Thurrock Thameside Nature Park
Mucking Landfill Site which has been transformed into a wildlife habitat and public park

Has won multiple conservation awards

120 acres (much larger than our proposal)
Key Dates

Construction of Landfill: 1st July 2015 - 1st January 2016
Landfill in use: 1st January 2016 - 1st January 2036
Nature Reserve construction: 1st July 2036
Open to public: 1st January 2037

Recycling Scheme Implemented: 1st January 2017
Full transcript