Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Barrie Gunter (2008). Media Violence : Is There a Case for Causality?

Brief outline of the elements of Gunter's paper
by

Julian Hopkins

on 25 September 2012

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Barrie Gunter (2008). Media Violence : Is There a Case for Causality?

Real world Laboratory Historical Verbal Reports Type of content
Attributes of media violence Real-world violence Artificial aggression Non-behavioural effects Audience attributes Media Violence : Is There a Case for Causality?
Barrie Gunter (2008) How is media content interpreted?
What is seen as violent?
Violence justified or not?
Realism - cartoon vs. real/realistic violence
How is the victim portrayed? Psychological characteristics and preference of persons
Different reactions to the same content 'Indirect effects'
Cognitive learning, responses, and mediation
Attitudes to violence
Emotional reponses, reduced arousal
Literacy models Link viewing and behaviour in individuals
Only measure inference of violence
Self-reporting accuracy is problematic Anecdotal is always just that
Connect mediated events (e.g. war, assassination) and violence?
Pornography and rape - which came first? Play aggression - observing children
Electric shocks as proxy
Artificial conditions always a limiting factor, but not to be disregarded Theoretical bias towards negative effects
Negative: Social learning theory, Disinhibition theory, Arousal theory, Desensitization theory
Postive/Neutral: Catharsis model, Time pre-emption theory, Ostracism theory, Predilection theory, conventionality theory Social significance of statistical significance
Larger sample = more possibility of statistical significance
Correlation is not causation
Meta-analyses: useful, but may compound methodological weaknesses Conclusions
Need to go beyond simple aggregation of data
Need to look over time and in social context
Take into account personal profiles, behaviours, social environment
Over a long time, engage, sample from time to time

Internet?
Full transcript