The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC
Networked Learning Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, May 3rd & 4th, 2010.
»
The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC Jenny Mackness, Sui Fai John Mak, Roy Williams What is a MOOC? Open Online Course Networked Learning Conference, 2010 The Ideals Autonomy Diversity Connectedness Openness The Reality Autonomy Diversity Openness Connectedness Learning begins with a connection, but connectivity is not sufficient for connectedness/interactivity. Meaningful connectedness and interactivity are difficult to achieve Massive 2200+ participants 1870 subscribed to The Daily online newsletter No entry requirements Free Distributed environments What is 'Connectivism'? Theory? Learning is the ability to construct and traverse connections connections readings discussions environments no barriers free flow sharing knowledge creation choice where when what with whom Interdependent identity, behaviour, safety, language, expertise, power, assessment, learning styles clarity of purpose, interpretation, constraints learning difficulties, wayfinding, support, trust With thanks to Stephen Downes and George Siemens for the CCK08 course and for allowing us to discuss this paper with CCK09 participants. Also thanks to Matthias Melcher for his contributions to this research. how 12 weeks Convened and 'led' by George Siemens and Stephen Downes To explore the potential of an open network for learning about and experiencing ‘connectivism’ - proposed as a new learning theory for a digital age. 'At its heart, connectivism is the thesis that knowledge is distributed across a network of connections, and therefore that learning consists of the ability to construct and traverse those networks.' Neural-biological Conceptual External-social The Research The Findings The Implications Discussion Survey Monkey 167 bloggers (inc. 19 forum users) 132 forum users 2 course instructors (n = 301). 90 responses = 29.9% response rate Questionnaire Email interviews 58 self-selected CCK08 participants (including the 2 instructors) 22 responses 37.9% response rate CMap from email interviews 37.9% response Autonomy Diversity Openness Connectedness Variously interpreted Some participants chose to work alone. 86% dropped out, but were they ‘lurking’? Afforded by technology but did not necessarily ensure interaction. Barriers to connectedness and interactivity were ‘trolling’, expertise divide, style of instruction 1. What are the pros and cons of open courses and/or networks for teachers, networked learners, course learners, and course managers? 2. What happens to the curriculum, quality assurance, and assessment? valued, but affected by confidence levels and assessment requirements nationalities, individual needs, cultures, ages, backgrounds, learning preferences Autonomy Diversity Openness Connectedness A complex, open course, rich in emergence, is defined by what must not happen, inverting the traditional design process Ethical considerations should be taken into account when ‘destabilising’ a course Constraints and moderation may be necessary for effective learning in a MOOC Autonomy Diversity Openness Connectedness References Downes, S. (2005). An Introduction to Connective Knowledge. http://www.downes.ca./cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=33034 [viewed 31-01-2010] Downes, S. (2006). Autonomy. http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/search?q=autononomy [viewed 07-08-2009] Downes, S. (2007a). What connectivism is. http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html [viewed 07-08-2009] Downes, S. (2007b). Groups vs Networks: The class struggle continues. http://www.downes.ca/post/42521 [viewed 31-10-2009] Downes, S. (2008). Connectivism: A Theory of Personal Learning http://www.slideshare.net/Downes/connectivism-a-theory-of-personal-learning [viewed 31-01-2010] Downes, S. (2009a). Access 20ER: The CCK08 Solution. http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2009/02/access2oer-cck08-solution.html [viewed 31-10-2009] Downes, S. (2009b). Connectivism Dynamics in Communities. http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2009/02/connectivist-dynamics-in-communities.html [viewed 07-08-2009] Mak, S.F.J., Williams, R. and Mackness, J. (2009) Blogs and Forums as Communication and Learning Tools in a MOOC. Networked Learning Conference, 2010. Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. elearnspace. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm [viewed 07-08-2009] Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. KnowingKnowledge.com Electronic book. www.knowingknowledge.com. [viewed 31-01-2010] Siemens, G. (2008). What is the unique idea in Connectivism. http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=116 [viewed 31-10-2009] Siemens, G. (2009a). What is Connectivism? Week 1: CCK09. http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=anw8wkk6fjc_14gpbqc2dt [viewed 12-02-2010] Siemens, G. (2009b). Continuing attempt to destabilise courses. http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/connectivism/?p=194 [viewed 07-08-2009] Siemens, G. (2009c). Different Social Networks, 30.07.09. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/07/30/different-social-networks/#respond [viewed 07-08-2009] University of Manitoba (2008). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge. http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/connectivism/ [viewed 07-08-2009] Flickr credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mark_twells/245199143/ - Jewels There are many dilemmas associated with attempting to fuse a course (particularly a MOOC) with a network Research wiki - http://connectivismresearchprojectb.pbworks.com/ '......to know something is to be organised in a certain way, to exhibit patterns of connectivity. To 'learn' is to 'acquire certain patterns'. influence experiences of influence experiences of influence experiences of