Introduction Gesture Research Goal Have 40 participants in each of 9 countries to create gestures for 28 actions Challenge #1 Ensuring repeatability Challenge #2 Recording gestures Gestures are used in an ever increasing number of products Some gestures vary by culture Challenge #3 Classifying consistently Series double tap; curve around object 1. Analyzed the top-generated gestures, and the very infrequent gestures Sorted gestures created for each action by frequency and statistically determined the top-generated gesture(s) and the very infrequent gestures 2. Analyzed for cultural differences - conducted 3 primary analyses Did one country use a particular gesture more than another? Did one country use a particular gesture type (direct manipulation vs symbolic) more than another? On visual inspection, did a pattern of responses emerge? 3. Analyzed for Novice vs Experience differences - 2 analyses Computed agreement scores for Novices and Experienced participants On visual inspection, did a pattern of responses emerge? Dan Mauney Method Data Analysis Results Results 1. Analyzed the top-generated gestures, and the very infrequent gestures 2. Analyzed for cultural differences - conducted 3 primary analyses On visual inspection, did a pattern of responses emerge? 3. Analyzed for Novice vs Exerience differences - 2 analyses On visual inspection, did a pattern of responses emerge? There was a higher agreement on gestures for actions that could be performed through direct manipulation and lower agreement on gestures for actions that were more abstract in nature Discussion 1. Most of the variability in participant responses was not based on culture China's use of symbolic gestures was the primary exception to this finding Good news for designers of global products 2. Back, Forward, Scroll Up, and Scroll Down exhibited the largest pattern of differences that is most likely due to experience with finger-driven touchscreen interfaces Few other differences found between Novices and Experienced participants 3. When a gesture to elicit an action was not immediately identifyable, participants generally wanted to tap on the screen to bring up a menu 4. For actions with no clear top gesture other than tap, a detailed examination of this dataset would be a strong first step toward identifying an appropriate gesture. One pattern we noticed when examining these ourselves is that participants often used the first letter of the action or drew the familiar windows icon when trying to create a shortcut Potential Follow-on Research Take the top gestures generated by participants and provide them to a new group of participants in a survey as multiple choice options and request a large number of participants in each country to select the gesture that makes the most sense to them Once participants have made all selections, allow them to go back and change previous answers after considering the gesture set as a whole. Allow iteration until participant feels the set is ideal. Checkmark Swipe Object Multi-Tap (anywhere) Swipe down Swipe Right Letter/word other than X Swipe/drag to neutral space Swipe across object X Letter/word other than X Question mark Swipe Curve or Circle CCW Swipe right Spread Swipe up Swipe diagonal Pinch Swipe down Swipe object Tap object sequentially Tap multiple objects simult. Carat or arrow betw. words Drag/swipe to new location Drag object to neutral space Letter/word other than X Curve or circle CW Swipe right Curve or circle CW Curve around object Sim press & hold & swipe Check Mark Letter/word other than X X Letter/word other than X Swipe object X on Object Belgium * Chile * China * Finland France * Germany * India * Italy Spain * Sweden * UK * USA 3. Analyzed for Novice vs Experience differences - 2 analyses Computed agreement scores for Novices and Experienced participants Sylvia Le Hong Delete object: % of participants performing an x on the to-be-deleted items Research Questions • Common gestures for familiar software actions? • Cultural differences in the use of gestures? • Differences between experts and novices? A cross-cultural gesture set Discussion Gesture set This study aims at helping designers understand how users expect to interact with a gesture-enabled touchscreen. Therefore, we took an initial approach to suggest a gesture set for the 28 investigated actions ... with a few caveats: Gestures were collected independently Gestures are interdependent and need to be evaluated as a complete set A lo-fi prototype was used to collect data >> no system feedback >> no learning and adaptation from users >> but intuitive behaviour unaffected by the system's response Accept / Verify Menu: Press & hold object Shortcut: Letter C anywhere Back Swipe right anywhere Close folder Tap object Continuous scroll down Swipe up repeatedly anywhere Copy Delete Cut Check mark on object Menu: Press & hold object Shortcut: Flick object X on object Swipe left anywhere Forward Minimize Home Swipe diagonal Question mark anywhere Menu: Press & hold anywhere Shortcut: Tap anywhere with 3 fingers Magnify Spread from object Help Multi select Tap object Press & hold object then swipe across multiple objects Drag / Swipe object Press & hold object Move object Open menu Open folder Redo Press & hold anywhere and curve / circle clockwise Press & hold object and swipe any direction Menu: Press & hold object Shortcut: Letter P anywhere Menu: Press & hold anywhere Shortcut: Carat Pitch Print Paste Scroll down Menu: Press & hold anywhere Shortcut: Letter S anywhere Swipe down anywhere Swipe up anywhere Scroll up Save Rotate image Curve / circle clockwise on object Zoom in Press & hold anywhere and curve / circle counter clockwise Tap anywhere Spread from object Pinch with any # of fingers on object Undo Zoom out Stop scroll Sorting Gestures 2. Analyzed for cultural differences - conducted 3 primary analyses Did one country use a particular gesture more than another? -->For the top 38 gestures (used by more than 40 people), there was no significant difference across country in their use of those gestures Did one country use a particular gesture type (direct manipulation vs symbolic) more than another? -->Country was significant at the p<0.001 level Thanks for your Attention! For further details, contact: Sylvia Le Hong - sylvia.lehong@uid.com Dan Mauney - dmauney@humancentric.com Follow our blog at: www.touchthinking.com View our Prezi at: http://prezi.com/ycecrqkvlj7i/
More presentations by Dan Mauney
Popular presentations
30 Things About Me
Brooke Ahrens on
All About Brooke Ahrens- I used this presentation as an icebreaker to introduce myself to my classes this year.
Future-Proof Your Education
Maria Andersen on
How do you prepare for uncertain career paths where technical knowledge doubles every two years? You pay attention to the skills that surround the content: ...
More popular prezis in Explore>