Send the link below via email or IM to invite your audienceCopy
Start the presentationStart presenting
- Invited audience will follow you as you navigate and present
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can view together your prezi
- Learn more about this feature in the manual
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Stirred, Not Shaken: An Assessment Remixology
Transcript of Stirred, Not Shaken: An Assessment Remixology
Students will create a remix of a movie trailer that disrupts, complicates, or challenges the underlying ideology in the original. Students may incorporate some original content in the composition, but should keep in mind that this is primarily an exercise in rearranging, combining, and transforming pre-existing material. This remixed trailer will be accompanied by a 2-3 page reflective statement. FAIR USE DOCTRINE:
Guidelines that outline the limitations imposed on traditional copyright law (basically, the exceptions that allow us to sample, copy, quote, and remix without permission):
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
The nature of the copyrighted work
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work WHAT THIS MIGHT LOOK LIKE:
# Heuristic to help guide brainstorming/concept planning.
# Framework for face-to-face feedback during initial composing stages.
# A central component of studio critique session.
# A component used in the accompanying designer’s reflective statement/rationale.
# Central part of grading rubric. QUESTIONS FOR YOU:
# Productive ways of extending or refining this assessment model?
# Adequately address rhetorical skills we generally try cultivating in our students’ work?
# Potential conflicts, complications, or things that give you pause?
# Appropriate for this assignment, or better to apply to other remix-type assignments?