By Claire Ross
Academics Twittering on Claire Ross Research Assistant Department of Information Studies University College London Email: claire.ross@ucl.ac.uk Webpage:https://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/claire-ross/ twitter:http://twitter.com/clairey_ross Blog: http://claireyross.wordpress.com/ pointless babble or enabled backchannel? digital backchannel #dh09 #thatcamp #drha09 #drha2009 4574 Tweets 326 Twitter users 77308 tokens twitter conventions polarisation Awareness of the backchannel "Top Tweeters" Motivation for using Twitter purpose of Tweeting during conferences use of #'s does Twitter enable a more participatory culture? Textual Analysis Open coded analysis lack of feedback nervousness of asking questions single speaker paradigm "non verbal, real-time comminucation which does not interrupt a presenter or event" Ynege 1970 twapperkeeper.com RT @ link disparaging and disrespectful "I use Twitter as a form of note-taking and information sharing" "I wanted to both regurgitate and aggregate good points for people attending and people not attending." "1. reporting out to people who aren't there 2. note taking, but in public 3. backchannel" To make the proceedings more of a discussion (including with those not at the conference" "As a record for myself for later," Does Twitter enable a more particpatory conference culture? "Absolutely. Instead of zoning out, I can now be an active participant in more than just the question and answer portion of a panel. It allows the audience to interact with the presenters and with one another." "I have been unimpressed by backchannels presented on conference podiums behind speakers. I find they distract from the presentation. I think tweeting should be silent and discreet." "Certainly. There have been famous cases where the backchannel turns ugly, with people tweeting harsh criticisms of the speaker while s/he is speaking (this happened to danah boyd at the Web 2.0 expo, for instance, and to a speaker from Ruckus at a conference of web developers from higher education), but so far that hasn't happened at a DH conference." Frequency Word 2243 thatcamp 1917 dh 752 http 603 s 488 digital 400 m 311 t 302 rt 294 drha 277 humanities 268 bit 267 briancroxall 258 ly 243 elli 232 amandafrench 204 session 200 up 199 dancohen 195 com 187 nowviskie 90:9:1 community of practice uneveness of participation 90:9:1 90% lurk 9% contribute from time to time 1% participate a lot power #fail TEXT comments on presentations sharing resources discussions/conversations jot down notes establish online presence post organisational questions ambiguous Jot down notes: Dh09Twitteruser: French: humanities are already digital, but not digitally literate. #Dh09 Comments on presentations: Dh09Twitteruser: really enjoyed @dhTwitteruser1 presentation on how she used MONK tool to read Stein #dh09 Establishing online presence: Dh09Twitteruser: Just remembered I have binary M&M’s. Oh joy of Joy’s! Post organisational questions: thatcampTwitteruser: what’s the trajectory of learning ‘digital’ things in dh? Simple skills that build into deeper understanding? #thatcamp sharing resources: ThatcampTwitteruser: http://www.speculativecomputing.org/ivanhoe/ IVANHOE: A game of critical interpration #thatcamp Discussions/conversations: ThatcampTwitteruser1: @thatcampTwitteruser2 I’ll have to think about it. They’re not totally orthogonal, but seem so in practice. #thatcamp so what does all of this mean? photo from mw2009 flickr pool photo from mw2009 flickr pool adapated from museum 2.0 blog adpated from museum 2.0 blog photo from Dannh Boyd blog photo from mw2009 flickr pool